Pages

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Xbox 360 price cuts not enough to best PS3 this holiday

With the recent rumors of Microsoft cutting the Xbox 360’s price confirmed today, it would appear that Microsoft has preemptively stolen the spotlight from the new PS3 Slim’s introductory price matching the reduced tag on the “fat” Playstation models. In all honesty, Microsoft is only setting itself up for failure this holiday season by not pricing it lower than the PS3, which sports an arguably better feature set. In addition, the news that Microsoft is cutting HD cables out of the retail box for the Elite is stirring up a storm on the internet, and raising questions of whether or not $300 for the slightly outdated system is a decent price when pressed against a $300 Blu-ray player.

Of course, Microsoft expects to prey on the unwitting customers who see the inevitable new marketing campaign for the 360’s price cut to rush out and buy the new console without much thought or research on the current gaming marketplace. When looking at a spec sheet, the PS3 bests the 360 in nearly every checkbox. Blu-ray? Check. Free online services? Check. Wi-Fi? Check. The list goes on, and while LIVE may or may not be worth paying $50 a year for (depending on your perspective and how much you use the service), to the raw, uninitiated consumer this looks like a bargain compared to the inevitably more expensive 360. What’s more is that the new PS3 Slim has the same allure as the PS2’s slim offering, in the fact that it’s essentially a rebirth of the original system. Sleeker, sexier, and definitely smaller, the PS3 slim is going to stand out in the crowd of consoles this holiday season, even if it isn’t to gamers looking for their Uncharted 2 fix, but rather entertainment enthusiasts eager to see what the latest Blu-ray Bond movie looks like in 1080p.

The Arcade model for the 360 isn’t helping matters much either, considering that to get a piece of hardware that rivals both the Elite and the PS3 costs, in the end, more than just buying one or the other right off the bat. Microsoft’s insanely inflated prices on their first-party accessories are so insulting to anyone who knows anything about technology that most people end up going with third-party devices that either work just as well (in the case of wireless adapters), or a whole lot worse (in terms of Mad Catz controllers vs. official Microsoft ones). With the price cut of the Elite, the only way that the 360 could have a remote advantage in a direct price-point comparison is to lower the cost of all accessories to match their “real-world” value (I’m looking at you Wireless Adapter). The official HDMI adapters for the 360 offer one advantage over standard HDMI cables, and that’s the optical audio port, but the retail price for these is so horrifically high that most people won’t even bother, opting instead to just use cheap cables (that, for the record, work just as well) that they can easily find online for under $5.

The only effective way for Microsoft to beat out the PS3 this holiday season is to really market, and I mean REALLY market, the new social networking features such as Facebook and Twitter, as well as the Instant-On 1080p video technology rolling out later this year. Instant-On could very well be the 360’s saving grace in the HD movie department, granted it works as advertised (you can check out an impressive demo of the tech here). Unfortunately, most of the big name exclusives happen early on in the holiday season, and the rest of the heavy hitters (Modern Warfare 2, this means you) are multiplatform. And if I may do a little speculation, why not ditch the practically worthless Arcade model altogether and replace it with the Pro, not the other way around? Hard drives are cheap, and you can’t possibly tell me that the chrome disc tray is costing upwards of $50. Microsoft’s multiple SKU strategy is wearing thin every year, and it would at least be nice if the most accessible, cheapest model was also a fully capable one, not a gimped machine missing core components.

In the end, I love my 360 as much as the next guy (maybe even more!) but Microsoft is doing a horrible job of keeping up with the Jones. The PS3’s got a better feature set on paper, the Wii is still a mainstream sensation, which puts the 360 where exactly? An overpriced console with few truly advantageous abilities over the other guys? It’s time to wake up Microsoft. I miss the company that launched a year early to prove to its fanbase that it was more than capable of delivering the premium console of choice for gamers with all the fixings. While it still has a ton of redeeming qualities and features some of the best exclusives, I can’t help but feel that Microsoft is playing its cards a little too close to its chest when it really needs to lay down the chips in preparation for the big game this holiday season. Lower the price of accessories, make the Pro model the entry-level system, and market the hell out of the new dashboard features and the aging system will stand a chance against the much newer-looking PS3.

Agree? Disagree? Sound off in the comments!

10 comments:

  1. I agree that Microsoft seems to be making poor hardware decisions. But the 360 will still outsell the PS3 because of the games and Netflix, I think.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Yea, I really hope that they market the hell out of those new features, because in all honesty, the PSN doesn't have much on LIVE in terms of applications and usability. If Microsoft plays to these strengths, it'll be an interesting battle of hardware versus software.
    ReplyDelete
  3. I see no argument on games between the 360 and PS3 seeing how the PS3 has Uncharted 2, Rachet and Clank, Gran Turismo 5 etc. And the 360 as Halo ODST, Forza 3, LFD2 I guess..

    And the PSP and PS3 have that Video store.. Basically the only thing the 360 can beat in the PS3 is the online that you pay for. While the PS3 is free it isn't exactly the same. The PS3 has had Facebook and Twitter since launch..
    ReplyDelete
  4. Couldn't agree more with this article. The 360 is getting on now - 3 years plus and at those who wanted a 360 already have one. Why bother buying a console that's not bluray compatible and still paying for online gaming subscription when the competitor is doing it free? It use to be that the 360 had the larger set of exclusive games, but I gotta give it to Sony, they have worked their sorry asses of in producing a fine exclusive line-up this year and next of triple AAA blockbusters. Plus the ps3 has all the big multi-platform hitters, eg. Modern Warfare 2, Assassin's Creed 2, Batman. and it seems Triple AAA multi-platformers are looking and performing better on PS3 nowadays. That's just my gut feelings anyway.
    ReplyDelete
  5. Netflix really? Netflix is only available in America. So to any consumer outside the United States, Netflix doesn't matter much. Live is a service and not software. It charges you to use your internet to play with a friend online. Games for Windows doesn't charge and it's Live for pc users. Besides most people either already own or have owned a 360 in America.
    ReplyDelete
  6. Netflix instant 1080p is freaking myth. The bandwidth would crush your internet connection. For some reason i doubt that the "so-called" instant on 1080p will even compete with Blu-ray "no speculation" 1080p.
    ReplyDelete
  7. @Death2494 Take a look at that tech demo I linked to. I'm pretty sure it's using some modified version of the streaming technology OnLive has advertised. It really does work, BUT only if you've got a 5+ Mbps connection (if you want true 1080p anyways).
    ReplyDelete
  8. i read a article on IGN saying that when the instant 1080P is live, using it will take up 4MBps bandwidth.
    if thats true its a INSTANT! FAIL.
    because that is way way way to much, 99% of people i know have a 8 GB limit max.
    4MBps would eat that up so quickly you would go over your limit just watching 1 movie per month, no surfing web, no demo downloads, just spent on movies.
    they need to get it down to MAXIMUM 1GB per movie, that way people can watch movies without using there whole download limit.
    sony and M$ are way ahead of themselves, digital distribution is not going to be a viable solution for years to come.
    the speeds not there and even more restricting is the download limits there way way way to low.
    until 5Meg is the standard and 50GB per month is the standard were not going to see DD take off.
    ReplyDelete
  9. Support the gaming initiative : PS3
    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't think much of the PS3's Blu-Ray. It's a good technology, but the war between Blu-Ray and HD-DVD lasted too long, especially with download services (like Blockbuster's) increasingly available. Blu-Ray just isn't the inevitable next step, like DVD was. Its market share is still limited, and probably will remain so.

    Good points, about Netflix being only in American and 1080p streaming being doubtful. But HD downloads is another story. I know people who use their 360s mainly to rent movies occasionally for their HD-TVs.

    Both the 360 and PS3 have great games, but they're distinctly different design styles. Sony makes more games with Asian aesthetics and playstyles, whereas the 360 has nailed American aethetics (as reflected in sales). I'm not sure where Europe and other regions fall in that spectrum. I don't think there's a lot of crossover between 360 owners and PS3 owners. The style of games you prefer is the main factor in the choice of most gamers.

    Agreed, it sucks paying for Xbox Live... especially when a game like Call of Duty 4 doesn't have dedicated servers. That Microsoft charges for stuff like Themes and Picture Packs is utterly ridiculous. But the multiplayer matchmaking and other features do make the subscription worth it, in my opinion.
    ReplyDelete